data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f39ec/f39ec4811ef60d41aea1c4b5f38475afc80762e2" alt="Wordrake grammer"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03316/0331640bfce5999b77fea5b7b0c58d79410c2d61" alt="wordrake grammer wordrake grammer".png)
If we write, “We smell good,” “smell” links the subject “We” to the adjective “good,” and so the sentence means, “The aroma we exude is pleasant.” If we write, “We smell well,” “well” is an adverb modifying the action verb “smell.” So that sentence means, “Our noses are in good order.” Other linking verbs that can also be action verbs are act, appear, fall, go, grow, keep, look, make, prove, remain, sound, stay, turn. The most prevalent of these hybrid verbs are the ones we use to describe our five senses: see, hear, feel, taste, and smell. Most “linking” verbs can also be “action” verbs. Those first three adjectives and that noun above are called “subject complements.” But who cares? That’s ironic, because Jorge is a doctor. We can also “link” a noun to the subject to show a relationship between the two. “To be,” “to seem,” and “to become” are the three “pure” linking verbs they cannot be action verbs we're just linking a noun with the adjective that modifies it: Linking verbs suggest a state of being other verbs denote action.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dbe6/3dbe6bb57970e7f61d06f9c68a8b48847d08c852" alt="wordrake grammer wordrake grammer".png)
We usually place an adjective before the noun it modifies but sometimes we place it after a noun and join the two with a “linking” verb. With the Grammarians came the advent of “linking verbs” and “subject complements,” and darkness fell across the land. The Grammarians did bad, and it was bad, and they thought they were doing well at doing good, but they were doing bad, and doing good very badly. Then the Grammarians swept in from the East, riding large horses, and everything changed. Once upon a time, long, long, ago, well was good, and good was well, well was doing good, and good was doing well, and the world was fine, and it was good. Our experts made sure to review all popular Grammar Checker Software solutions that you can find on the market, but among all the ones we reviewed these three deserved our special attention: Reverso, Grammarly, Ginger Software.You know that moment’s hesitation, that flash of panic, when someone asks, “How are you?” and you aren’t sure whether to say, “I’m well,” or “I’m good"? Likewise, you can also assess which software company is more credible by sending an email request to the two companies and find out which vendor replies faster. GrammarCheck has 8.4 points for overall quality and N/A% rating for user satisfaction while WordRake has 6.9 points for overall quality and 88% for user satisfaction. We also let you evaluate their general scores to know which one appears to be more suitable. You can examine the details, including available tools, costs, plans offered by each vendor, offer conditions, and many more This guarantees that your enterprise can select the most productive and useful program.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fb93/2fb9343a7b75c99ffa2a1a8e5caf8c84ab420234" alt="wordrake grammer wordrake grammer"
What is better GrammarCheck or WordRake? When you compare GrammarCheck and WordRake, it is simple to see which Grammar Checker Software product is the more effective alternative.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f39ec/f39ec4811ef60d41aea1c4b5f38475afc80762e2" alt="Wordrake grammer"